1. I think if a photographer makes the mistake once and this is the first time for it to happen then they should get a second chance, but if it is found that they have altered photos on many instances then I don't think they should get a second chance.
2. I don't think he should be tainted for the rest of his life, but his photos for a couple years should be monitored until he proves that he won't alter photos again.
3. News organizations should have these rules because they are trusted to put out the entire truth for people to see, when you alter a photo you are taking out the truth.
4. I think they may have looked at other photos taken at the same time and place and realized that there were other people and things that could have been in the photo. They most likely reexamined the photo and found that some of the lines don't match up.
No comments:
Post a Comment